Brammo Owners Forum
Brammo Empulse Discussion => Brammo Empulse => Topic started by: 00049 (AKA SopFu) on May 29, 2013, 08:57:44 PM
-
I can't believe I'm the first person to see this!
http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/808/16279/Motorcycle-Article/2013-Brammo-Empulse-Recall-Notice.aspx (http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/808/16279/Motorcycle-Article/2013-Brammo-Empulse-Recall-Notice.aspx)
Only five bikes are affected. I wonder how they figured that out?
-
Mine is one and I take it in tomorrow. Not sure what the update is but it didn't sound major.
-
I didn't see that til now! I haven't gotten notified so don't think I am one of the 5.
-
Could be something they corrected very early, or a defect that occurred on only a single week of production.
Glad they're on top of it.
-
I didn't see that til now! I haven't gotten notified so don't think I am one of the 5.
True. According to Brammo, all five owners have been contacted. If you go to this page (http://www.autoevolution.com/news-g-image/2013-brammo-empulse-recalled-for-potential-shorting/125145.html#sjmp) you can see some photos of the terminals. Amazing to me that such a minor difference can affect the bike. Good thing that they discovered this early.
-
It looks like the B- connector, if installed so that it rides the divider, could potentially rotate around and short against the M1 far side terminal.
-
I'm limited in what details I can give, but just wanted to provide some additional insight that should put everyone at ease:
1. No failures of this type were found on any production bike or bike in the field (to include marketing bikes).
2. No failures of this type were found on the bike that was tested rigorously for durability by an independent lab.
3. It is NOT necessary to "check your bike" as this would involve dropping the motor controller and exposing yourself to the high voltage/current cables. Only a trained service technician should do this. We are 100% confident that the problem does not affect bikes outside of these 5.
4. The 5 bikes (only) affected had a single re-work/update operation performed off the production line removed them from standard controlled work process.
Last point - although the article reads as though this was a NHTSA enforced recall, you should understand that this is a voluntary recall by Brammo (as are most OE recalls) - i.e. we alerted NHTSA and drafted the documents you see, not the other way around.
Thanks!
-
Sounds like its more of an inspection and the recall was driven by Brammo. Its proactive. Its just an alignment of the terminals and cables going to the controller.
Adam picked up my bike last night and took it to Polaris to do the inspection/recall. Should have it back soon.