I'm certain it's a mistake. The 6 kwh and 10 kwh empulses should be nearly identical as far as efficiency goes, so if one is rated at 60 miles the other should be rated at 100 miles.
It's worth noting that the Empulse mile ratings are based on a higher power budget - eg faster riding - than the Enertia.
Enertia 3.1 kwh:
Claimed 40 miles nominal (7.8 kwh/100 mi), urban commuting. 30 miles, 10.3kwh/100mi suburban; 20 miles, 15.5 kwh/100mi highway.
The energy usage reports I've seen have been around 30 miles, or 10 kwh/100mi in 35-45 mph traffic. 55 mph is closer to 13 kwh/100 mi.
Enertia Plus 6.0 kwh:
Claimed 80 miles nominal (7.5 kwh/100 mi), urban commuting.
Empulse 6.0 kwh:
Claimed 60 miles nominal (10.0 kwh/100 mi).
This is likely to match closely to the 35-45 mph traffic of the Enertia. Highway commuting 65-85 mph may be more like 15-20 kwh/100mi, or 30-40 mile ranges.
Empulse 10.0 kwh:
Claimed 100 miles nominal (10.0 kwh/100 mi).
Highway commuting 65-85 mph more like 15-20 kwh/100mi, or 50-65 mile ranges.
Note these are all energy at the pack. Charging adds another 15-20%, so you're looking at suburban efficiency of 12 kwh/100 mi, highway efficiency of say 20 kwh/100 mi.
Compare that to the Nissan Leaf, which is rated by the EPA (at the wall) at 34 kwh/100 mi, and in practice seems to be getting 30-50 kwh/100 mi.