The 112 mile range of the Zero S is a huge lure to that bike. The lower model is almost the same distance as the Enertia Plus. Its top speed is higher than the Enertia Plus. It has the option for quick charging and according to the specs can plug into a 220v plug. You may even get one before the Enertia Plus. The only difference is a higher price than the Enertia Plus.
Yeah, it's likely that the Zero S will be available before the Enertia Plus.
I think the 220v is a euro-plug only thing. You're still only getting 1kw from the onboard charger, no matter if it's running on 110 or 220.
The extra $2500 over the Enertia Plus presumably buys you a bit more performance and top speed and the lower maintenance of the belt drive. I suspect actual ranges will be very similar between the two bikes, with the Zero having perhaps a bit more range at low speeds.
More importantly, if Zero delivers in February then there really will be no competition.
I like Brammo as a company (good business decisions) but Zero has 1-uped Brammo with getting their product, with better specifications, to customer quicker (or am I wrong?).
I myself want to get an electric bike at some point (may be able to early next year). That 88 MPH max on the Zero S is the biggest draw I have (and stated 42 miles at 70 MPH on the lower model, 62 on the next one up). Every time I look down at my spedo I see 70 MPH on the roads I drive on and others are doing the same speed or faster. This isn't the interstate either. This makes me think twice about the Enertia Plus.
Zero has a much faster iteration process than Brammo. Each year they've refined the S, from 2009 to 2010 to 2011 to 2012. Brammo has announced significant and welcome changes to the Enertia to be released with the 2012 Enertia and Enertia Plus, but that's really the first major change the bike has seen since its release in 2009, besides an almost immediate price drop from $12k to $8k in November 2009.
In fairness to Brammo, the 2011 Zero S was the first time that I saw a comparison test that favored the Zero as a complete package. Competition seems to be improving both of the companies, which has the neat side-effect of making electric vehicles more palatable to the rest of the world.
Zero reports "highway commute" range as half the distance traveled at 70 mph, half the distance at 25-35 mph. If you travel the entire trip at 70 mph, the 6 kwh S should do around 30 miles and the 9 kwh S should do around 44 miles. (and by the way, the Empulse should be similar .. 50 miles at 70 mph on the Empulse 10.0 is pretty reasonable).
If you need to travel at 70 mph then the Enertia is definitely out, unless Brammo reveals a higher top speed for the Enertia Plus then it is out as well.