Author Topic: Empulse vs. Encite  (Read 1790 times)

1lesscar

  • Empulse Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Empulse vs. Encite
« on: May 29, 2011, 08:42:31 PM »
Encite should get wayyy more range, right??? Anybody know?    :-\

Liv2xplore

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Just a goofy conservative that loves E.V.'s
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Empulse vs. Encite
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2011, 12:14:48 AM »
Not too sure where you're coming from with that ???, but I would expect the Empulse to have a much better range on pavement. 60/80/100 mile range on the Empulse. Encite will probably be set up with around 30 mile range to keep weight from the battery and motor down for dirt track purposes. It will, of course, depend on how hard you ride, too.
Being Conservative doesn't mean loves Big Oil.

1lesscar

  • Empulse Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: Empulse vs. Encite
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2011, 10:31:39 PM »
Not too sure where you're coming from with that ???, but I would expect the Empulse to have a much better range on pavement. 60/80/100 mile range on the Empulse. Encite will probably be set up with around 30 mile range to keep weight from the battery and motor down for dirt track purposes. It will, of course, depend on how hard you ride, too.


I mean the ENGAGE SMS (street). I think this because it should be much lighter than the Empulse, and should carry as many batteries.

WTH, the price is 12000. That's the same as the Empulse 12.0?? :o

protomech

  • Brammovangelist
  • *****
  • Posts: 1987
    • View Profile
    • ProtoBlog
Re: Empulse vs. Encite
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2011, 10:38:19 AM »
Not too sure where you're coming from with that ???, but I would expect the Empulse to have a much better range on pavement. 60/80/100 mile range on the Empulse. Encite will probably be set up with around 30 mile range to keep weight from the battery and motor down for dirt track purposes. It will, of course, depend on how hard you ride, too.

I mean the ENGAGE SMS (street). I think this because it should be much lighter than the Empulse, and should carry as many batteries.

WTH, the price is 12000. That's the same as the Empulse 12.0?? :o

$12k is the same price as the Empulse 8.0.

The federal 10% rebate applies only to street bikes of at least 2.5 kwh, so really you're looking at $10,000 for the Engage SMR vs $10,800 post-rebate for the Engage SMS.

Autoblog states that the Engage MX and SMR will have removable batteries of at least 2.6 kwh, and that the Engage SMS may have a fixed battery. Brammo may be deciding whether to produce the SMS with a larger battery pack or not.

I wouldn't expect the Engage to be much more efficient than the Enertia/Empulse, as the higher rolling-resistance dual-sport tires will compensate for the lower weight of the bike. I suspect the SMRE transmission is slightly less efficient than the direct drive as well.
1999 Honda VFR800i | 2014 Zero SR
Check out who's near you on frodus's EV owner map!
http://protomech.wordpress.com/

1lesscar

  • Empulse Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: Empulse vs. Encite
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2011, 12:45:26 AM »

When I talk about $$$$ I never count the rebate.

It does NOT come from Brammo
   
      :-[and who knows if it is still available when the Empulse is for sale.




Not too sure where you're coming from with that ???, but I would expect the Empulse to have a much better range on pavement. 60/80/100 mile range on the Empulse. Encite will probably be set up with around 30 mile range to keep weight from the battery and motor down for dirt track purposes. It will, of course, depend on how hard you ride, too.

I mean the ENGAGE SMS (street). I think this because it should be much lighter than the Empulse, and should carry as many batteries.

WTH, the price is 12000. That's the same as the Empulse 12.0?? :o

$12k is the same price as the Empulse 8.0.

The federal 10% rebate applies only to street bikes of at least 2.5 kwh, so really you're looking at $10,000 for the Engage SMR vs $10,800 post-rebate for the Engage SMS.

Autoblog states that the Engage MX and SMR will have removable batteries of at least 2.6 kwh, and that the Engage SMS may have a fixed battery. Brammo may be deciding whether to produce the SMS with a larger battery pack or not.

I wouldn't expect the Engage to be much more efficient than the Enertia/Empulse, as the higher rolling-resistance dual-sport tires will compensate for the lower weight of the bike. I suspect the SMRE transmission is slightly less efficient than the direct drive as well.

Richard230

  • Brammovangelist
  • *****
  • Posts: 2519
    • View Profile
Re: Empulse vs. Encite
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2011, 10:52:04 AM »
I concur about not counting on the federal and state rebates. The way the state and federal budgets are going lately, I do not have any high expectations that such rebates will be available next year.  :(
current bikes: 2018 16.6 kWh Zero S, 2011 Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic, 2009 BMW F650GS, 2007 BMW R1200R, 2005 Triumph T-100 Bonneville, 2002 Yamaha FZ1 and a 1978 Honda Kick 'N Go Senior.

protomech

  • Brammovangelist
  • *****
  • Posts: 1987
    • View Profile
    • ProtoBlog
Re: Empulse vs. Encite
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2011, 01:44:02 PM »
Good point. That's why these credits should really move from a tax-time credit to a point-of-sale rebate. Far too much uncertainty otherwise.
1999 Honda VFR800i | 2014 Zero SR
Check out who's near you on frodus's EV owner map!
http://protomech.wordpress.com/