Author Topic: Pouch cells vs cylindrical cells  (Read 833 times)

protomech

  • Brammovangelist
  • *****
  • Posts: 1987
    • View Profile
    • ProtoBlog
Pouch cells vs cylindrical cells
« on: April 10, 2012, 07:44:05 AM »
Tesla used cylindrical cells (18650s) in the Roadster and now again in the Model S. Presumably the same cells in the Model X due in 2014.

Most of the other "major" EV industry players have gone the pouch cell route. Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, Zero (switched from Taiwan Molicel cylindrical cells to Korean EIG NMC pouch), Brammo (switched from American Valence LiFePO4 cylindrical cells to ?? NMC pouch in the E+ and the Empulse).

Mitsubishi seems to be a standout in that they're using (rectangular) prismatic cells.

Unsure what Toyota, Renault, Ford, and GM's Spark will / do use.
1999 Honda VFR800i | 2014 Zero SR
Check out who's near you on frodus's EV owner map!
http://protomech.wordpress.com/

Richard230

  • Brammovangelist
  • *****
  • Posts: 2518
    • View Profile
Re: Pouch cells vs cylindrical cells
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2012, 10:18:22 AM »
I assume that was done because pouch or rectangular cells are more space-efficient than cylindrical cells.  ???
current bikes: 2018 16.6 kWh Zero S, 2011 Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic, 2009 BMW F650GS, 2007 BMW R1200R, 2005 Triumph T-100 Bonneville, 2002 Yamaha FZ1 and a 1978 Honda Kick 'N Go Senior.