The entertainment section of my newspaper today contains a review by Daniel M. Gold of the NY Times regarding a new movie titled "Revenge of the Electric Car". Ironically, GM, who the article claims was "clearly rattled" by the 2006 movie "Who Killed the Electric Car", invited the director of "Revenge", Chris Paine, to document their development of the Chevy Volt and provided Bob Lutz to serve as "tour director". "Over three years, ending in 2010, the film also tracks the ordeals of Elon Musk at Tesla Motors and Carlos Ghosn at Nissan Motors as they develop the Roadster and Leaf." The movie also "showers love on Greg Abbot, a California mechanic who converts gas-run cars to battery power".
The review continues that: "trying to retain its street-cred skepticism, the film cuts to analysts and journalists who note that concept cars often have been featured at auto shows, only to be driven back into the garage". The film discuses that "daunting obstacles persist, such as battery life and driving-range limits, production costs and consumer-friendly pricing."
The review says that the information provided in the movie is nothing new for industry watchers, but for most audiences, "Revenge" is a "snapshot of a major industrial shift on its way to a tipping point". Lutz is quoted as saying that "electrification of the automobile is a forgone conclusion" and that "Ghosen has built his company's entire marketing strategy around that expectation".
Mr. Gold concludes that: "Revenge of the Electric Car" is "a slick, enjoyable valentine to a retooling industry". And the "optimistic film lacks the outrage of the the earlier work, but that is OK. A movement need its triumphs, too."
The movie is "not rated", its running time is 1 hour, 30 minutes, and Mr. Gold gave the movie a 2 & 1/2 star rating.